Home Page General Articles Genesis Science Mission
Scripture Categories Genesis Science Mission Online Store

Creation Links

Anomalies Creation Science Talk Blog

Is Creation Science, scientific?

The critics of Creation Science claim that it is not falsifiable or subject to change. However this is not true because Creation Science theories are falsifiable and subject to change.

 Both Creationists and Evolutionists use observation and measurements to develop, and test hypotheses and theories that make falsifiable predictions. They both revise and abandon theories based on new data and they both use internal peer review. Both sides also have some holdouts for generally abandoned theories. These similarities show that Creation Science is at least as scientific as Evolution.

Some Creationist theories have been falsified and most Creation Scientists consider these theories to have been falsified. As is often the case there are still some supporters but most Creation Scientists do not support them any more.

Some creationist theories have been modified to deal with problems that were found wit the original concept. 

 Some Creationist Science Theories have made successful predictions, these include the following:

The critics of Creation Science also claim that it is not science calling it Creationism. However Creationism is the philosophical bases for Creation Science and not Creation Science itself. Even many creationists don’t understand this. The problem is that calling Creation Science, Creationism is the same as calling Evolution Science, Naturalism.


 The issue is one of philosophical foundations


Both Naturalism and Creationism are philosophical foundations, they are philosophy; not science they are not subject to change,


Both of these theoretical systems are structure and not Science not subject to change

Both system produce scientific theories that can be categorized as Evolution Science and Creation Science. This is where the real science is because these scientific theories are both subject to change.

Anti-creationist claims that biblical creation prevents scientific investigation. The claim goes that since the Bible gives the story of how it all began, so there is no need for investigation. It is further claimed that creationists know the out come in advance.

These claims are wrong.

The Truth is that Biblical Creation has inspired a lot of scientific investigation and theories. Examples Include Dr. Humphreys theory of planetary magnetic fields, Catastrophic Plate Tectonics, Accelerated nuclear Decay, and The RATE project which was a massive Creation Science research project studying radio isotopes.

The Biblical account does not give all the details of Creation and the Flood leaving a lot is left for us to discover by researching and studying nature. Creationists do not know the out come of research in advance.  While the Bible does provide an historic framework It does not give all the details. Evolutionists also have an historic frame work and they work from those results from Naturalism. That historic frame work is Big Bang to man Evolution

A comparison of Creationist and Evolutionists

Both Creationist and Evolutionists have definite historical frame works
Both Creationist and Evolutionists build theories around their respective historical frame work.
Both Creationist and Evolutionists have expectations about results.
Both Creationist and Evolutionists interpret what they find by way their respective historical frame work.
Both Creationist and Evolutionists are equally scientific.



Sponsor a page

at $1 a month

$11 for a year

Support this website  with a $1 gift.


Visit our

Online Store

Gifts of other amounts

Click Here


Custom Search