|Home Page||General Articles||Genesis Science Mission|
|Scripture||Categories||Genesis Science Mission Online Store|
|Anomalies||Creation Science Talk Blog|
Creation Science is the scientific study of origins from a Biblical perspective and despite what evolutionists may claim this is not a contradiction of terms. Creation Science starts with the assumption that God created the universe called creationism. Like naturalism, creationism is purely philosophical assumption. It is essentially science based on the Bible.
It may come as a surprise but Creationists and Evolutionists have the same evidence, but different interpretations. The key is that Evolutionists dismiss the Bible as a collection myths or at best a mixture of myths and history; while Creationists work from the the view point the Bible contains real history starting from Genesis 1:1.
Creationists see the Bible as an historical Document. That is events described in the Bible are real historical events. The Bible is not just a collection of religious stories or a collection of myths, neither is it history mixed with myth. When possible historical documents are the best way to study the past, and the Bible is the best preserved ancient historical document known. In fact archeologists in Israel often use the Bible as a guide.
So Creation Science can be defined as the study of history and the physical sciences in light of the Bible. The key is not confusing scientific evidence with a particular interpretation.
Furthermore, God, the Bible, and the basic concepts of Creation as found in the Bible are the assumptions that form the foundation for the development of scientific theories. Together, God, the Bible, and Creation form the foundational assumptions of a theoretical system for interpreting data. The fact is that if the same data is interpreted by a different theoretical system the interpretation may be different.
Creationists produce scientific theories but the Biblical account is used as a starting point. The resulting theories make testable predictions many of which have been successful. Example of creationists theories with successful predictions include:
Dr Humphreys’ White Hole Cosmology is an example of a creationists theory the need adjustment and where it’s been done. Other creationists theories have been largely abandoned when shown wrong such as The Canopy theory of the Genesis Flood and C-decay.
Contrary to what Evolutionists may claim Creationists do engage in Peer-Review. When possible main stream journals are used however there are three major Creation Science Peer-Review Journals.
|The Bible is an
|Is the Bible
|Attempts to reconcile the Bible
with naturalistic origin models
|Historical documents verses
other dating methods